-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Blog-Stratford Web Design on Is Microsoft’s ‘Accidently Leaked’ Secret a Social Networking Project?
- Tweets that mention Blog-Stratford Web Design -- Topsy.com on Proposal for web-based parking solution
- Tweets that mention Blog-Stratford Web Design -- Topsy.com on PCC makes first privacy ruling on Twitter quotes
- Tweets that mention Blog-Stratford Web Design -- Topsy.com on Amazon to launch movie streaming service?
- Tweets that mention Blog-Stratford Web Design -- Topsy.com on Website puts old stories on the map
Archives
Categories
Tags
2011 Amazon Bing BuddyPress Chrome cloud networking CMS Domain Names Facebook Google Google Chrome internet Internet Explorer ipv6 Linkedin Microsoft mobile new new design new site new web design New website new website design new website launch search engine Search Engine Optimisation Search Engine Optimization Search Engines seo skype social media Social Network Social networking social networks Stratford Stratford Upon Avon Twitter Web Browser Web Browsers Web Design Web Development website launch WordPress Yahoo youtubeSyndication
Login
Subscribe to Posts
Blog
Having recently lost a Google contract that added tweets to the company’s search results, Twitter is treading shaky waters in ongoing negotiations with Microsoft over a similar use arrangement.
According to All Things D’s Liz Gannes, there are a few pain points over which the two companies are currently chatting. But, if successfully negotiated, Microsoft could ultimately land the keys to the real-time kingdom: long-term access to the real-time updates provided by both Facebook and Twitter, which would accompany the site’s standard search results.
The two companies have six extra months to hammer out the details—Twitter signed real-time search contracts with Google and Microsoft in the fall of 2009, but Microsoft got a slightly longer timeframe than its big competition. Twitter is allegedly asking for an increased licensing fee for use of its real-time information: $30 million, or double the cost of the company’s original contract with Microsoft.
While that sounds like a lot, Gannes reports that it’s actually one of the “less contentious” parts of the negotiations. Twitter wants increased control over Bing’s user interface, or how its information is presented within Microsoft’s search, in addition to more links to Twitter itself within Bing. The two sides also have yet to come to terms with advertising: Specifically, how both companies will split revenue for advertising that appears in conjunction with Twitter information.
The elephant in the room, however, is just how much Microsoft needs real-time feeds. And more importantly, how the company’s apparent push into the social space could affect ongoing negotiations. Consider Google: While the company lost access to the official Twitter firehose once contract negotiations imploded, Google went right around and deployed its own social network, Google+, which it will invariably use to build real-time social information into its search results in some extended, future capacity.
While Twitter might already have the established user base, it’s possible that Microsoft sees a future where its own alleged social service, code-named Tulalip, becomes the company’s real-time information repository.
And it’s also possible that Microsoft could eschew the entire idea. As Gannes writes, real-time search has yet to become a driving factor on today’s Web: In fact, the market for third-party real-time search services has been imploding as of late. To Microsoft, establishing complicated licensing arrangements with other companies just to gain access to a firehose of real-time chit chat about the latest Harry Potter movie might not be worth the effort in the long run.
Tags: Bing, Microsoft, Twitter
Related posts





